There are advantages to hiring a general practice attorney rather than a specialist. Many misunderstand and believe they always need a lawyer who specializes in a particular branch of law. In reality, general practice lawyers are just as effective at most professional duties as their counterparts who claim an intricate knowledge of a subject area.
The average person, who usually is not involved in some nuanced case, will probably be better off with a generalist. To help those out there who might be unconvinced, following are three reasons why a general practice lawyer can be a wise choice for the common man or woman.
1. They are Prepared for Any Problem
Being harassed by creditors, needing to file a restraining order against an abusive partner or drawing up a will, then a general practice attorney can help. Regardless of the issue, these "renaissance" lawyers have the knowledge and experience to at least begin the job.
This level of preparedness differs from that of specialists. Someone who has spent years learning one specific area of the law has also ignored all the others. Sure they learned a variety of subjects in law school, but the real world is different. A specialist may balk at the everyday problems that plague people. Meanwhile, a general practitioner can be a compassionate counsel in times of trouble.
2. They Can Handle the Paperwork for Less
Many clients just need some paperwork completed and filed. Yet, they lack the ability to do it themselves. Those self-help law books at the local library usually only lead to confusion. So, these individuals wind up hiring a lawyer. If they choose a specialist, they can expect to pay a bit more than at a lower budget general practice.
This disparity in costs can arise because of the nature of a specialist practice. Lawyers who specialize need to pay for in-depth professional development courses. They might have extensive office libraries full of books in their field. Moreover, they have to raise capital for the expected high-cost cases they must handle to make a name in their specialty.
A general practitioner can handle the same paperwork at less cost because their overhead may be lower. These lawyers can take almost any case that comes through their doors, so there is no need to spend money now to catch the few that arise in their specialty later. This savings can redound to clients who pay only for the labor to complete boilerplate paperwork in many cases.
3. They Can Have More Courtroom Experience
Most lawsuits settle outside of court. There are both generalists and specialists who have never tried a case in court. However, given that general practice attorneys take on a wider variety of cases, they are more likely than specialists to have spent time in a courtroom. This experience can benefit clients. It is usually not the best thing to be the client when a lawyer is trying their first case.
Many law schools even link general practice and court litigation together in the curriculum.
As shown here, a general practice attorney can be of immense benefit to the average American. It may be wise to speak with such an attorney first (like those at Herbert Law Firm LLC and similar locations), then let them help locate a specialist later, if the need arises.
Share
